User talk:212.219.91.241

September 2009

 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Block/Blockage
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as block, is in fact, Block/Blockage, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Block plus Blockage. Block is not a blockage unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning blockage system made useful by the block corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full Blockage as defined by BLOCKIX.

Many block users run a modified version of the blockage system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of blockage which is widely used today is often called “block”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the blockage system, developed by the Blockage Project.

There really is a Block, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Block is the action: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The block is an essential part of a blockage, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete blockage. Block is normally used in combination with the blockage system: the whole system is basically blockage with block added, or Block/Blockage. All the so-called “Block” distributions are really distributions of Block/Blockage.

November 2012
Hello, I'm Moe Epsilon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Iran women's national futsal team because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Regards, — Moe   Epsilon  05:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brett Ratner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Mediran talk to me! 09:50, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012
Hello, I'm Jonathanfu. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Lacey Chabert, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jonathanfu (talk) 11:44, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cryptography have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 11:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2021
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Adi Yussuf—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to HMS Seringapatam (1819). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 11:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Infographic, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 11:44, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at HMS_Seringapatam_(1819). If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 15:44, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Yeovil, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 11:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)