User talk:212.250.118.138

July 2021
Hello, I'm Zudo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to French Navy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Zudo (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jenny Morton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.- gadfium 19:21, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm InvalidOS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dege & Skinner seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Invalid OS talk  15:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Prague Spring have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Kpg  jhp  jm  12:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SmartSE (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm DoebLoggs. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Daniel Bonevac have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DoebLoggs (talk) 10:43, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Transfusion practitioner, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:27, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Transfusion practitioner. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  14:34, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.