User talk:212.29.41.147

March 2023
Your recent editing history at WorldNetDaily shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Schazjmd  (talk)  22:32, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Just as a follow-up: the other editor was incorrectly removing the websites, and has been blocked. It's better to try and educate the misguided editor than to edit war with them. This wasn't clearcut vandalism, and no real damage is done to the encyclopedia if a URL isn't in the infobox for a short period of time. The two articles are back to normal now so you can go on to whatever type of editing you enjoy.  Schazjmd   (talk)  22:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)