User talk:212.39.89.151

June 2017
Hello, I'm Prinsipe Ybarro. I noticed that in this edit to Rafa, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Prinsipe Ybarro ( Talk to me ) 09:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rafa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rafa, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rafa. - Arjayay (talk) 09:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

It is controversial.212.39.89.151 (talk) 09:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:02, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

212.39.89.151 (talk) 10:07, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Replacing an article about the name, which covers many people called "Rafa" (including other famous ones) with a redirect to a specific one destroys the rest of the article and removes useful information from Wikipedia. Even if there is a primary topic, it would still not be done like that. And it is clearly contested (which you could tell from the first time you were reverted), so it would need talk page discussion first. But no, you edit warred to try to bludgeon your way through, which is disruptive, and that is why you are blocked - and that is what you need to address if you want to be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello, I'm Kosack. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Callum Hudson-Odoi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nathaniel Clyne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kosack (talk) 15:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at A.F.C. Bournemouth, you may be blocked from editing. Kosack (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nathaniel Clyne. Kosack (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to VPM has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: VPM was changed by 212.39.89.151 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952857 on 2020-08-04T17:01:29+00:00

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to VPM—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2020 (UTC)