User talk:212.44.18.150

-SpuriousQ (talk) 13:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page William Wright has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SMC (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Robert Louis Stevenson. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Robert Louis Stevenson. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

To edit, please create an account and log in 

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org unblock-en-l] from an email address listed on your school's website. Alternatively, if you have no Internet access at home, you may [mailto:unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org email us] using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. Or you may use the form here. An account will be created for you. Please check on [ this list] that the username you choose has not already been taken.

Proposed deletion of Imperial Party of New Zealand


The article Imperial Party of New Zealand has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not a notable joke party. Article is not referenced, and only three sentences long.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm BranStark. An edit you recently made to Hurricane Gonzalo seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — BranStark (talk) 13:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Heinkel He 111 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Heinkel He 111, you may be blocked from editing. Denniss (talk) 11:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Name Omitted. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kibera, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Name Omitted (talk) 14:51, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Imperial Party of New Zealand for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imperial Party of New Zealand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Imperial Party of New Zealand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HenryCrun15 (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm Yeeno. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Prince Philip movement, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    Yeeno   (talk) 🍁 17:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Celtic mythology—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Megan B....  It’s all coming to me till the end of time  10:10, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Prayer Book Rebellion have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 10:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Prayer Book Rebellion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 10:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prayer Book Rebellion, you may be blocked from editing. DuncanHill (talk) 10:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Prayer Book Rebellion. DuncanHill (talk) 10:13, 4 February 2022 (UTC)