User talk:212.58.103.3

Welcome
 Hello, 212.58.103.3, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
 * The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

212.58.103.3, good luck, and have fun.   scope_creep Talk  08:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Elçin Sangu
Hi I reverted your edits on the Elçin Sangu. The work you put in was well structured, apart from the WP:PEACOCK terms you put in and is well written, but you've put in broken references that are showing errors on the page. Please take a look at WP:REFB which is a wee tutorial on howto create well formatted references. Try and fill in all the fields if you can. The more the better means the reference will survice longer and the article can be found 10 years up the road. The article can probably be reverted if you can fix the references. There is two references in the lead which for some reason have been completly broken and not replaced or perhaps they put in and forgotten. Can you please fix them as well. Thanks.  scope_creep Talk  08:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, I don't understand the reasons why you reverted it as I updated an actress' filmography which was stuck in 2017. I mentioned all the work she has done since then till the present day without validating any rules. I thought it would be helpful for you as well as the users of wikipedia who would have gotten more information about her. I used truthworthy information, you said references were showing errors and the terms I used was problematic somewhere so you could've removed those parts instead of deleting everything I wrote. Please can you revert it back? so it will be easier for me to find my mistakes and i'll correct the references and "peacock terms" in those parts. 212.58.103.3 (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Forgot to add. if my article wasn't suitable for your standards, i would like to ask you to update Elçin Sangu page since there is no information about her career since 2017.
 * Thanks. 212.58.103.3 (talk) 10:49, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I really don't want to update it. I have too much on. The only thing that was wrong was the references. Take a look at WP:REFB, once you have a look at that you can crack on and do it yourself. Hope that helps.  scope_creep Talk  11:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)