User talk:213.1.226.211

September 2013
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wood grain have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 10:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Nah m8

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to William Whitelaw, 1st Viscount Whitelaw has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: William Whitelaw, 1st Viscount Whitelaw was changed by 213.1.226.211 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.946365 on 2014-01-20T11:22:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Carol Ann Duffy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Carol Ann Duffy was changed by 213.1.226.211 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873965 on 2014-02-10T11:13:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Charles Albert of Sardinia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 09:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Emanuel School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Emanuel School was changed by 213.1.226.211 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924067 on 2014-03-10T09:33:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Trochaic tetrameter, you may be blocked from editing. Fraggle81 (talk) 15:38, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Trochaic tetrameter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Trochaic tetrameter was changed by 213.1.226.211 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952101 on 2014-03-17T15:39:06+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —S MALL JIM   15:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Hello, I'm Microchip08. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Molesworth-St Aubyn baronets, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Microchip08 (talk) 10:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Angie Lewin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Angie Lewin was changed by 213.1.226.211 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.913963 on 2014-12-01T13:43:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:43, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Angie Lewin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Original Bob (talk) 13:52, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015
Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cesare Balbo because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hull City A.F.C., you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:10, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015
Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Egg because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Plant surfer 13:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joe Hunt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 17:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bok choy, you may be blocked from editing. Wolbo (talk) 17:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neil. Takeaway (talk) 12:23, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Tap and die, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tap and die. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:28, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Worst Person in the World— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 12:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 10:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Kleinpecan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Dionysia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Kleinpecan (talk) 09:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Douglas Parnham, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Douglas Parnham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.    Angry Harpy   talk 10:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Battle of Agincourt—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Battle of Agincourt. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)