User talk:213.162.80.92

perhaps this paper helps you and finally stops the trolls pushing a "West-Eurasian agenda" on Turkic peoples and related articles, once and for all: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jse.12938

Link for full excess:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366965287_Ancient_Genome_of_Empress_Ashina_reveals_the_Northeast_Asian_origin_of_Gokturk_Khanate

We have unveiled the first genomic profile of the ancient Türkic royal family and Chinese historical celebrities. Our genomic analyses of Empress Ashina revealed Göktürk's Northeast Asian origin (97.7% Northeast Asian ancestry and 2.3% West Eurasian ancestry), refuting the western Eurasian origin and multiple origin hypotheses. We found Ashina shared most genetic affinity with post-Iron Age Tungusic and Mongolic Steppe pastoralists, such as Rouran, Xianbei, Khitan, and Heshui_Mohe, and showed genetic heterogeneity with other ancient Türkic people, suggesting the multiple sources of the Türkic Khanate populations. Furthermore, the limited contribution from ancient Göktürk found in modern Turkic speaking populations once again validates a cultural diffusion model over a demic diffusion model for the spread of Turkic languages.

Pinging too; note that specific users may belong to the same nationalist Turkish group which push a West-Eurasian origin for Turkic peoples. Note that specific users claiming to be a American English speakers, occasionally use the letter ü, pointing to a Turkish speaker or input set. Also check out the claim that Eastern Scythians were Turkic speakers recently included in the article Dingling. Btw., the East Asian origin model for proto-Turks is supported by all published papers since 2015. Thats speaking for itself, so much to WP:Weight... Only to think about, no need to trust me, the facts here are easily verifiable and obvious, make yourself a picture. Stay safe...