User talk:213.18.128.21

August 2020
Hello, I'm DB1729. I noticed that you recently removed content from Iain Duncan Smith without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DB1729 (talk) 21:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:16, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Iain Duncan Smith for a period of 72 hours for continued disruption, including unexplained blanking of reliably-sourced content and POV changes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Please use the article talk page to discuss your concerns. Your current edits are disruptive.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:22, 7 August 2020 (UTC)