User talk:213.205.240.179

September 2018
Hello, I'm Darsana.vinod. Your recent edit to the page Karl Pilkington appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darsana.vinod (talk) 12:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Hello, I'm Girth Summit. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Harold Wilson seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 13:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harold Wilson. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:38, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Harold Wilson
Hi - thanks for taking an interest in this article and trying to improve it. There are certain forms of writing that we are careful to avoid, however. You wrote But Wilson, who, unlike Winston, was born a commoner, was never made a Companion of Honour as his forerunner was. This gives the impression that Wilson was not made a Companion of Honour because he had been born a commoner. That may well be true, but if it is then we should say that directly, and the assertion should be sourced. For example: "Unlike Churchill, Wilson had been born a commoner, and so was not made a Companion of Honour as Churchill was." - this would then be cited to a reliable source. We could still include it even if it's speculation by an expert in the field, for example: "Unlike Churchill, Wilson had been born a commoner, which, according to Professor Knowledgeable in his 1996 book Everything you ever wanted to know about Harold Wilson, but couldn't be bothereed to ask meant that he was ineligible for the role of Companion of Honour, which Churchill was made in 19whatever". I hope that makes sense - try to stay factual and direct, rather than imply meaning. Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  15:55, 27 October 2019 (UTC)