User talk:213.205.251.210

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Banana Sprite challenge has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not continue adding your own calculation for the number of years an individual has appeared on a soap opera. The inclusion of the actual year they first appeared allows for any reader to calculate the amount of time the subject has been on the program; adding your personal calculation will only lead to the material being incorrect within the span of a year.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ingress (video game) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ingress (video game) was changed by 213.205.251.210 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954316 on 2016-07-15T07:19:35+00:00.

Hello, I'm JudgeRM. I noticed that you recently removed some content from IERA without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that things being "taken out of context" is not a valid reason for removing properly sourced content. JudgeRM   (talk to me)  16:40, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at IERA. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm KoshVorlon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nigella Lawson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kosh Vorlon    21:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)