User talk:213.4.81.6

Hi I fully understand your position in regards to this case, however the subject is a living person, the case has run its course and the punishment served. So why do you want to publish this over Wikipedia?

I am merely trying to come to mutual ground on this

It is important the biographies include the full picture not just those facrs of which the subject approves. Incedentally the invividual in still on the SOR thus making it a significant issue if this in not reflected to the general public. 213.4.81.6 (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Like I have said I do fully understand your point of view and that you think this is interest for the public, my point is that you are citing the newspaper as you well know the news articles are not always correct, you refer to the paragraph as 'Child Abuse Conviction' again we both know this is not the official charges! so I am arguing that this is incorrect and that you are citing the newspapers.

I have also tried to correct the rest of the page, ie. his early life, discovery eg, and you have continually undone it, why? I am being factually correct!

May I please draw your attention to these; WP:SOURCES WP:AVOIDVICTIM

AS I said previously I am only trying to understand why you are so insistant on this being on the page, I have made it clear that I have a conflict of interest regarding this article, I am also not hiding!

(Capbadge (talk) 21:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC))