User talk:214.1.101.252

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 17:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Your recent edit to Pit Bull (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to The O'Reilly Factor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Pseudomonas(talk) 18:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LonelyBeacon (talk) 21:33, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Vince Agwada
An article that you have been involved in editing, Vince Agwada, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Vince Agwada. Thank you. Schuy m 1 (talk ) 21:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created, Vince_Agwada maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/Vince_Agwada.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
 * 1) You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
 * 3) When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
 * 4) You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 10:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page United States Census Bureau has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 19:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2010
This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Dodgeball. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ALI nom nom 17:22, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Monkey Kung Fu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Endofskull (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to TVR, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=467225612 here]. Sincerely, Akjar13 (He's Gone Mental) 19:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Calu2000. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Herpes simplex virus because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Calu2000 (Talk) 19:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at New Richmond, Wisconsin with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.   Wikipelli Talk   19:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

May 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to National Defense Service Medal, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ESkog. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to National Defense Service Medal, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, (ESkog)(Talk) 18:47, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Holly's Law for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holly's Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holly's Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)