User talk:215.67.6.84

February 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Agnathosia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Agnathosia was changed by 215.67.6.84 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954867 on 2014-02-20T04:29:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Eddie Lee Ivery, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 07:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to SEZ has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: SEZ was changed by 215.67.6.84 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.993384 on 2014-07-23T09:18:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SEZ with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.  RationalBlasphemist  (Speak)  09:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Thank you for your contributions&#32;to Boatswain's mate (United States Navy), but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 17:47, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vancouver, Washington, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - BilCat (talk) 13:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

September 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Lor Talk 06:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Richard Winters. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. NOTNOTABLE (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Bec Rawlings
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Arkansas Centennial half dollar
Hi, I enjoyed your edit. I notice that it's by permission of Heritage. I know Heritage has given permission for one of our editors to upload images of auction lots, but I wasn't certain it extends to text. Can you go through the procedure at WP:OTRS so we're sure readers can freely use the text? Also, is there a written or online source you got it from, so we can have a footnote with the citation? All the best and thank you,--Wehwalt (talk) 15:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Texas A&M Aggies seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Texas A&. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:29, 12 December 2017 (UTC)