User talk:216.130.86.33

September 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rory, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:58, 25 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Ludicrous. Saying a stupid list of American baby names trumps a native Irish speaker with first hand knowledge on the language is moronic and why Wikipedia is going down the drain.
 * it is not a unisex name, it’s masculine. As I said in my edit explanation, just because brain dead Americans use the name inappropriately does not changes its meaning and appropriate use. 216.130.86.33 (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The reference provided in the unisex definition even meets this criteria for “original research” it’s not a reliable citation yet it’s being used to justify the butchering of my language 216.130.86.33 (talk) 02:50, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The reference in question is a primary source from a government site. The information cited, namely the amount of female babies born bearing the name, is based on Social Security card applications in the US — it is not conjecture, but rather factual information as documented by the Social Security Administration. It is reliable and certainly does not constitute original research. Your first hand knowledge, on the other hand, certainly does.
 * The name has begun to be used differently than it historically has, as most names do. As editors of an encyclopedia, it is imperative for us to reflect accurate, up-to-date information. Itsrorybd (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If you wanted to be truly accurate the article would reflect that it is a male name that is occasionally used to name girls. Not that the name is in and of itself unisex. My first hand account is that I’m a native speaker of the language with additional formal education on the matter. The United States ssa does not trump my knowledge simply because they document a stupid American phenomenon. The accurate accounts of history ought to be that “for some reason some people named girls with this boys name” 216.130.86.33 (talk) 18:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That may be your opinion, but original research is not a reliable source for an encyclopedia article. —asparagusus   (interaction)  sprouts!  18:38, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * "Occasionally," would imply that it is used infrequently and irregularly as a female name. Both the SSA source (as well as the Canadian equivalent, which has now also been cited) indicate that this is not the case; Rory's use as a female name is quite high and has only been growing. As previously noted, changes in the genders of names are not uncommon. Itsrorybd (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm The Herald. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Rory have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Rory. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Asparagusus. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:216.130.86.33 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  18:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rory. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  18:35, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.