User talk:216.154.31.5

Hi there, please don't make any edits without research and knowledge. Việt Cộng (a.k.a the Southern Liberation Front) was disbanded after 1976 when the two sides of Vietnam is united under the single Socialist Republic of Vietnam, and it was never a BRANCH of People's Army of Vietnam. If you keep "contributing" ignorant edits like this one, your IP/account might be blocked. Besides that, please USE A WIKIPEDIA ACCOUNT.

=
================================================================================================================== Chào bạn, bạn vui lòng ko thực hiện những chỉnh sửa sai lệch và thiếu kiến thức như thế này. Việt Cộng, hay còn gọi là Mặt Trận Giải Phóng Dân Tộc Miền Nam VN, đã bị giải thể sau cuộc tổng tuyển cử thống nhất đất nước năm 1976 và được kế nhiệm bởi 1 nhà nước CHXHCNVN duy nhất và chưa bao giờ là một QUÂN CHỦNG của QĐNDVN. Nếu bạn tiếp tục thực hiện các chỉnh sửa sai lệch như thế này thì bạn hoàn toàn có thể bị chặn chỉnh sửa trong tương lai, và mình đề nghị bạn hãy sử dụng và đăng nhập tài khoản wikipedia của bạn thay vì thực hiện những cuộc chỉnh sửa ẩn danh và vô giá trị như thế này.

Bdhuyvn (talk) 19:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Bùi Đức Huy

April 2021
Your recent editing history at Gestapo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Antique Rose 11:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kriegsmarine.   Sennecaster   ( What now? ) 00:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Waffen-SS
Your recent editing history at Waffen-SS shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Antique Rose 13:42, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Waffen-SS) for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing on Waffen-SS. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)