User talk:216.162.88.130

Your submission at Articles for creation: Braden Jabbour (December 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timothyjosephwood was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Braden Jabbour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Timothy Joseph Wood 15:30, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Narcissus (mythology) ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Euryalus (talk) 13:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Braden Jabbour
Draft:Braden Jabbour, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Braden Jabbour and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Braden Jabbour during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. North America1000 12:51, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm מושך בשבט. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Norristown, Pennsylvania—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. מושך בשבט (talk) 16:01, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bethesda Softworks—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:56, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Manhwa—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Big Nate (TV series)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:34, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Geneva Conventions. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.   MichaelMaggs (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Geneva Conventions, you may be blocked from editing.   Simplexity22 (talk) 16:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)