User talk:216.169.5.115

February 2019
Hello, I'm Nick Number. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to CRS have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Nick Number (talk) 20:39, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gunther Schuller. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 16:25, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bessie Smith, you may be blocked from editing. aboideautalk 16:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bessie Smith. Serols (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at George Meade, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 49 TL  17:07, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Equatorial Guinea—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tarcisius have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tarcisius was changed by 216.169.5.115 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854896 on 2021-11-17T15:27:39+00:00

December 2021
Hello, I'm LuK3. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Dominic Savio have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --   LuK3      (Talk)   15:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Beastboi421


A tag has been placed on Draft:Beastboi421, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ◇  Helen   Degenerate  ◆ 20:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beastboi421 (December 9)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Beastboi421 Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)