User talk:216.174.74.1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jan Nevole (August 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3={U}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jan Nevole and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jan Nevole, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jan_Nevole Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hoary&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jan_Nevole reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

declined this, saying "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations." It was then resubmitted,without any change to citations. Again: The material doesn't meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Notably, there are a number of index numbers for references that turn out to to be utterly unhelpful. I suspect that this is because whoever translated this from Czech or Serbian did so rather robotically, untroubled by a complete lack of understanding of how the references worked in that source article. This failing is a great pity, because this draft looks very interesting. I'd very much like to convert an improved version of this draft into an article. However, anything that looks at first glance like a reference must actually be an informative, useful reference.|sig=yes}}