User talk:216.201.248.18

September 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Larry Elder, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

August 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Chanda Prescod-Weinstein. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 21:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chanda Prescod-Weinstein. Melcous (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)


 * You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chanda Prescod-Weinstein. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
 * Points to note:
 * Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chanda Prescod-Weinstein. 216.201.248.18 (talk) 15:55, 28 August 2023 (UTC)