User talk:216.241.55.204

Edits that don't belong to User:Ionas68224 made by this IP, since he has had it (June 2009):
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dreadstar †  19:38, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Deborah Honeycutt has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://ohbabythatswhatilike.blogspot.com/2008/04/this-blog-endorses-dr-deborah-honeycutt.htm). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Question
Can you confirm that you're User:Ionas68224? SlimVirgin talk| contribs 23:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. I'll log in as User:Nevadawp2 and make a null edit. Jonas 216.241.55.204 (talk) 23:53, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Done Jonas 216.241.55.204 (talk) 23:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Just repeating here what I posted on the COI page. If you're banned, you ought not to be posting, and especially not posting allegations about other editors. Please request an unblock by posting a note on your talk page. You can read how to do it here. But you can't keep on editing without going through that process. Cheers, SlimVirgin  talk| contribs 00:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

To J Delanoy and Alison
J Delanoy: The block of User:Paz_y_Unidad was justified, but I am very curious as to what inspired the block. Were you informed of it, and if so, by whom? How (IRC, private wiki e-mail, or some such thing)? Did you just happen upon that AFD and checkuser it because Doc Glasgow said it was a sock? I suspect some secret, backdoor private communication vehicle by which someone informed you, with less than pure intention.

Alison: OK, I won't, but I certainly did not anticipate being blocked over this. It is 12:10 in the morning and I am going to bed in my little apartment in Southern Nevada (we share a time zone, however). Also, I never log out of my jdrand account, nor did I do so when I was active under it. This is why, if I close my browser while actively reading a thread, for 15 minutes after I have closed my browser, it lists me as reading the thread. I wasn't actually reading, but it looked like it. Bye! Jonas Rand 216.241.55.204 (talk) 08:10, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

My talk page
Any further posting at my talk page is harassment. Stay away. Rhomb (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Your response is knowingly lacking in diplomacy; threats are not elements of constructive discussion, especially when based on speculative theories about my intentions. To avoid such misguided speculations, I have stated my intentions, hopefully clarifying them, on your talk page. J.216.241.55.204 (talk) 18:57, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.     Thank you.  Rhomb (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
for. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
 * This is unjust. I did not "out" anyone. The revisions were out right deleted, not even revision-hidden, but deleted, by Nihonjoe on orders by User:Rhomb. These were not an attempt to identify User:Rhomb as anyone, nor did it have anything to do with WP:BLP. This has nothing to do with violation of privacy policy. It does not apply to oversight at all, because it was not an attempt at identification. I asked if User:Rhomb knew who the Wikipedia Review user "Grep" had anything to do with him or her, and then when it was misinterpreted as an attempt to out him, I tried to explain that I was merely asking a question. It was unanswered, of course. And where is the proof that I was the user who posted those IRC logs, presumably User:Ionas68224? J.216.241.55.204 (talk) 23:08, 29 March 2010 (UTC)