User talk:216.30.25.90

This Wiki article deserves thoughtful and deliberative sourcing improvements regarding plenary powers and how those powers impact state, federal and Constitutional law — especially in regard to "unchecked oversight" and immigration. Broadening the sourcing could help eliminate perceived (and/or actual) bias, as both the Heritage Foundation and the Center for Immigration Studies are known to be partisan lobbying organizations.

Additionally, updating this Wiki page with more contemporary instances of plenary power could improve NPOV, as well.

Less-partisan sources for consideration: National Constitution Center, Yale Law Journal, Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, Columbia Law Review, Indiana Law Journal, SCOTUSblog.com, studies and scholarly reports by non-partisan immigration law professionals, etc.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2017/07/symposium-end-plenary-power/

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/testing-federal-power-over-immigration/505232/

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/who-can-be-excluded-as-an-immigrant-to-the-united-states

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/legal-issues-involved-in-the-trump-immigration-travel-order

https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1863&context=faculty_scholarship

https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1277&context=blrlj

etc.

I'm open to any and all feedback. Thank you!

ChillyDurden (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2019 (UTC)