User talk:216.37.138.250

February 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:14, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 16:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mother Jones have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mother Jones was changed by 216.37.138.250 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883031 on 2022-09-13T16:26:37+00:00

November 2022
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jack-o'-lantern, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. A Rose Wolf  15:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Frances Slocum have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 16:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Benjamin O. Davis Sr., disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 13:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to Sushi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Quantum, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. CodeTalker (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Douglas Jung—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  15:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Douglas Jung. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  15:26, 1 March 2023 (UTC)