User talk:216.37.216.42

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Garion96 (talk) 18:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

different IP addresses, same vandalism
Due to the strong parallels (same pages, same type of data falsification, same type of summary) between the vandalism of this anonymous IP address and those of the addresses 64.111.150.150 (actually blocked), 204.108.198.2 (about to be blocked), 216.222.231.48 (actually blocked), 209.74.40.114 (been blocked), 216.37.222.136 (warned), 216.37.216.183 (been blocked), 199.224.119.95 (been blocked), 64.111.150.178 (blocked) and 213.46.51.142 (about to be blocked), they might well be used by the same user (group). Additional addresses will be used sooner or later. My advice : don't give such vandal 4 more chances to vandalize our work before kicking him out again (and again). - DéRahier 19:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

All edits of this user up to now have been checked and all (!) had to and have been reverted. - DéRahier 21:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)