User talk:216.47.187.52

April 2019
Hello, I'm Girth Summit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ethics of artificial intelligence have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Girth Summit  (blether) 12:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Zora Neale Hurston has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Zora Neale Hurston was changed by 216.47.187.52 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889272 on 2019-04-29T14:03:40+00:00

May 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yemen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. aboideautalk 16:07, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Worcester v. Georgia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Worcester v. Georgia was changed by 216.47.187.52 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952864 on 2020-01-23T20:07:14+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Worcester v. Georgia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Nightenbelle (talk) 20:08, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Marcy Borders has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Marcy Borders was changed by 216.47.187.52 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950723 on 2020-02-12T13:59:42+00:00

September 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Newsboys' strike of 1899. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lennoxfretz (talk) 14:29, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to William Steig have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: William Steig was changed by 216.47.187.52 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952835 on 2022-04-07T14:53:30+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Iraq War—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm Quid Est Squid. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Spanish–American War have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Quid Est Squid (talk) 15:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ella Baker. -Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

March 2023
Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gary Ervin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  18:27, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Ervin, you may be blocked from editing. Squeakachu (talk) 19:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gary Ervin. Squeakachu (talk) 20:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
Hello, I'm Felida97. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jeane Gardiner—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Felida97 (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Belbury. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to TikTok food trends have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 18:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at TikTok food trends. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at TikTok food trends, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Belbury (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)