User talk:216.48.132.9

October 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to RuPaul's Drag Race: All Stars (season 2)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to RuPaul's Drag Race: All Stars (season 2). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to RuPaul's Drag Race: All Stars (season 2), you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to RuPaul's Drag Race: All Stars (season 2). Serols (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 16:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Haploidavey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Religion in ancient Rome have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This IP has only just come off a recent block; further unconstructive edits will likely lead to a longer block than before Haploidavey (talk) 17:04, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to VanossGaming has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: VanossGaming was changed by 216.48.132.9 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96295 on 2016-12-13T14:36:33+00:00.

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fred Trump, you may be blocked from editing. 208.54.5.228 (talk) 01:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Thomas Hobbes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thomas Hobbes was changed by 216.48.132.9 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978997 on 2017-08-28T18:15:23+00:00.

September 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to How much wood would a woodchuck chuck— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:17, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at How much wood would a woodchuck chuck. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: How much wood would a woodchuck chuck was changed by 216.48.132.9 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977386 on 2018-09-12T14:18:34+00:00