User talk:216.53.137.131

April 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Shroud of Turin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shroud of Turin was changed by 216.53.137.131 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86951 on 2013-04-29T05:45:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm Lankiveil. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Vinnie Tortorich— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:37, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vinnie Tortorich with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Eric-Wester. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Valdez, Alaska— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Eric-Wester (talk) 22:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2021
Your comment on the Sheldon Zimmerman article (that you made in the comment for an edit) is deeply troubling. As revealed in the extensive press coverage and the reports by HUC and Central Synagogue, Zimmerman engaged in multiple acts of predatory sexual conduct. This is not a case of a single mistake.

That said, your comment led me to reread the article and to take the time to flesh out (with appropriate and extensive citations) the full story. So thank you for that.

I'm sure that Zimmerman has good qualities (all human beings do), but continuing to ignore the impacts of his misconduct is what will lead to future misconduct him or others to be ignored. That is not acceptable. Jmbranum (talk) 17:29, 5 December 2021 (UTC)