User talk:216.81.81.83

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 216.81.81.83. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.  'Please read Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest guidelines before editing any articles related to the United States government to ensure you are in compliance. Thank you. - the WOLF ' child  15:08, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Friends, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Xionbox₪ 11:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pro Wrestling Illustrated awards. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 19:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * FYI, contrary to your claim, there is NO discussion at Talk:S. Truett Cathy that supports removing attribution from the opinion that S. Truett Cathy supports anti-gay causes. There has been consensus in support of using the term itself.  Be advised, this is a BLP violation.   Belch fire - TALK  18:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your edit here to revert the rabid dog blanket deleting my work. It's probably best to leave it be for now since Arzel will just happily launch an edit war over it. Thanks again. See ya later, gator. Cowicide (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
Hello, I'm TheIrishWarden. I noticed that you recently removed some content from David V. Aguilar without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Thєíríshwαrdєn  - írísh αnd prσud 20:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to David V. Aguilar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thєíríshwαrdєn  - írísh αnd prσud 20:14, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013
Your recent editing history at David V. Aguilar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Your edits to Lankhmar
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lankhmar with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Petrb (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

July 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Randy Gregory, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I am One of Many (talk) 21:20, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - the WOLF  child  15:06, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, you may be blocked from editing. '' Also, you need to stop editing pages such as this where you have a Conflict of Interest. Instead, propose your changes to the talk page for discussion. Additionally, please leave an edit summary. Thank you - the WOLF  child '' 18:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Drew Storen. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Irvington, New Jersey has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackfork (talk) 04:30, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tom Marino— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to A Game of Pool (1989 The Twilight Zone). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LcawteHuggle (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mike Matthews— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018
Hello, I'm Amorymeltzer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to United States foreign aid have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 19:48, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2018
Hello, I'm Bruce Lee's Relative Chin. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Culvert— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Bruce Lee's Relative "Chin"  20:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Around the Beatles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dan Koehl (talk) 19:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page United States Border Patrol has been reverted. Your edit here to United States Border Patrol was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w77WkgygDAc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to United States Border Patrol. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 01:16, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. Your recent edit to Kermit Washington appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Moops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Historicity of Jesus have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 01:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm Novo Tape. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Rachel Dratch have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) My Talk Page 21:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Cat Rambo, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SHB2000 (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)