User talk:216.81.94.68

Conflict of Interest
Hello, 216.81.81.80. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. ⚠️Note: please ensure you are familiar with this guideline before you edit any articles about the United States government or any U.S. federal agencies. Thank you - w o lf  23:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Raw milk do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 15:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Uzair. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. M D Potter. Any comments? 20:10, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Cat Stevens. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The sources do not specify which immigration statute was being invoked; this is therefore original research and not allowed, even if it is accurate. That kind of detail, anyway, is not particularly helpful as it is unexplained. Tvoz / talk 06:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Penn State Nittany Lions football, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   19:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Penn State Nittany Lions football. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Blocked for 31 hours
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

July 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pro Wrestling Illustrated awards. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 03:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to WinShape Foundation appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Belchfire (talk) 11:29, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock request #1

 * Just for the record, while I'm not entirely pleased with Blurpeace's block, I was also probably going to block your account for edit warring at Chick-Fil-A (including a 3RR violation which I gracefully ignored) and WinShape both. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:40, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Block increased to 72 hours

 * Since you have been evading this block by using other IP addresses, the block length has been increased. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

This is a fine illustration of how pointless and stupid blocking is. Still-24-45-42-125 (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to Baitur Rehman, Silver Spring because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Torreslfchero (talk) 20:53, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Awards and decorations of the United States military. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. S. Rich (talk) 21:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014
Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chris Johnson (running back), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A.Minkowiski_Lets t@lk 17:59, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015
Hello, I'm TYelliot. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of federal agencies in the United States— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  22:38, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the Leviathan (1989 film) plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 18:01, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Talk:Pattie Boyd with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, I'm NottNott. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Pyrus calleryana— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - Nott Nott &#124;talk Notify with &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 16:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Faithful Word Baptist Church. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:17, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Shepard Smith, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - MrX 19:02, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Milli Vanilli, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Red tide. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarah Rose Summers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jebcubed (talk) 14:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tongo Tongo ambush. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Woodlot (talk) 13:29, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Horizontal segmentation (October 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Horizontal segmentation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Horizontal segmentation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Horizontal_segmentation Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Horizontal_segmentation reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 13:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Horizontal segmentation
Hello, 216.81.94.68. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Horizontal segmentation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello, I'm Arjayay. Your recent edit(s) to the page Huma Abedin appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:54, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Deltaspace42. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Palestinian Authority passport have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Deltaspace42 (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to United States Marshals Service, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. - w o lf  23:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)