User talk:217.149.166.11

Grand master  20:00, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Robert McClenon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Leave the comment alone  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 07:27, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Beshogur (talk) 14:15, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Grand master  23:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 06:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No, I am not interested in unblocking. This is what happens when bureaucracy overshadows facts and fairness. Now your proteges will do whatever they want to do. See you again in two days--217.149.166.11 (talk) 06:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Now Grandmaster is wreaking havoc as soon as I am gone. Shame on Wikipedia for allowing this--217.149.166.11 (talk) 11:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

"Artsakhian forces" v. Armenian forces
See the discussion about the Armenian occupation. It is not POV. Beshogur (talk) 13:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Where in the discussion does it say that the republic of armenia participated in the "occupation"? did they help financially ? yes. but the fighting itself was conducted by local ethnic Armenians.--217.149.166.11 (talk) 13:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Those resolutions are about Armenia, not about Artsakh, that the UN doesn't recognize. See the resolutions. Beshogur (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * They mention local Armenian forces. Please do not overcomplicate things--217.149.166.11 (talk) 15:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Grand master  15:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Continued warring in the Armenia-Azerbaijan topic area
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. If you were operating a registered account, I think we would already be considering WP:Arbitration enforcement under WP:AA2. That doesn't seem practical for an IP. EdJohnston (talk) 16:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)