User talk:217.179.195.113

November 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Battle of Copenhagen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Copenhagen was changed by 217.179.195.113 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984287 on 2013-11-05T18:29:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:29, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Email has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Email was changed by 217.179.195.113 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886 on 2014-01-20T10:51:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:51, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Email with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —— Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 10:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ludgrove School, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 19:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ludgrove School. Meters (talk) 19:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm Iwilsonp. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ludgrove School because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Iwilsonp (talk) 18:39, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Charles II of England has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Charles II of England was changed by 217.179.195.113 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929697 on 2016-06-30T15:30:30+00:00.

September 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dartmoor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   13:58, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to James Hunt have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Genetics. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:48, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Genetics was changed by 217.179.195.113 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873582 on 2017-01-17T12:48:11+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to HMS Shannon (1806), you may be blocked from editing. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 10:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello, I'm Theinstantmatrix. I noticed that you recently removed content from Goodwin without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. theinstantmatrix (talk) 19:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2018
Hello, I'm Cynko. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Beckwith— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Cynko (talk) 10:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)