User talk:217.181.61.216

February 2019
Hello, I'm Mstrojny. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to William Wilberforce have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Mstrojny (talk) 12:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Wilberforce. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Granville Sharp. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 12:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Slavery in Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Five themes of geography. - Arjayay (talk) 10:18, 11 June 2019 (UTC)