User talk:217.219.236.17/Archive1

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. The Behnam 18:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalise pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Neturei Karta, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yossiea (talk) 19:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust
Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -- Avi 20:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, which all articles must follow. Wikipedia is a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia; it is not a place to argue a particular point of view. Thank you.--Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 21:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Your comments
Essay-type prose written in story format such as "For several years, Palestinians…" is not acceptable under wikipedia's manual of style. Please see Guide to writing better articles.

To what exactly are you referring? -- Avi 21:42, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

stop grandstanding.
Your posts at WP:ANI have crossed the line, and I am ready to stop assuming good faith. You do not have legitimate complaints, and your continued grandstanding amounts to distruption. I am very close to blocking you for WP:POINT violation. Please stop now, and move on. Leave Avraham alone. If you have issues concerning the content of articles, please bring those issues to my talk page, where I will try to assist you, or Requests for Comment, where others can assist you. Further disruption of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or User talk:Avraham may result in a block. — coe l acan — 23:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I see that Chairboy has already blocked you for three hours now. Whether you were trying to change Avraham's password, or trying to create a new user with the username "Avraham", either is unacceptable. When your 3 hour block is over, my above warning still stands. Stop grandstanding or you may find yourself blocked again. — coe l acan — 23:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think I deserved a block. I apologized for playing with login page. --217.219.236.17 01:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Block
I've blocked you for 3 hours for your disruption, culminating in the password stuff. Harassing an editor you're in conflict with by using the password-request is absolutely unacceptable. Think it over during the block, and come back more mature please. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 23:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What about Avraham? Playing with login page changed nothing. He will ruin articles again, but I don't care anymore. --217.219.236.17 01:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)