User talk:217.42.183.109

I had to say this, you fucking wikipedian snobs
This is a message from Homer Simpson of Springfield;

"I Hate Wikipedia! It’s horrible, bossy, dishonest and evil. They take away the truth and replace it with so-called verifiability. When pointed out that they’ve made a mistake, the users NEVER accept that they’ve made a mistake, instead they deny it and come out with crap like “WP:BLP is policy” which it’s not, they made that up. You should see “The policy on verifiability”, they all made THAT up as well. Redrose64 is no exception to these either and that’s another thing, on 12th August 2016, Redrose64 had a go at 81.158.169.144, a kindly user for;

A. "using somebody else's signature on your own posts" when he really used his own signature on his own posts, B. "using a false timestamp" when he actually used a TRUE timestamp, and C. "adding your own signature to my posts" when he didn't add his own signature to Redrose64’s posts, REDROSE64 MUST BE SEEING THINGS IN HIS HEAD!

Also, How DARE he insult 81.158.169.144’s ability to sign correctly and I DECIDE WHAT A RELIABLE SOURCE IS, NOT THOSE BULLIES OF WIKIPEDIA USERS! As for Ted Edwards, this message is for him “I did not "claim" the policy on verifiability and the policy on living persons were “invented by Redrose64 alone when they were edited by other users”, I just said that Redrose64 made up those policies. Also, these edits I made are reliable source enough for anyone. Reference and Reliable source are the same thing.”

If THAT’S not enough. You even have a horrid man called JamesBWatson blocking you for having an extensive history of vandalism, block evasion, and trolling, doing disruptive editing, edit-warring, refusal to accept policy and other crap when you actually have had an extensive history of production, respect gaining and helpfulness, doing constructive edits, edit fixing, knowing the difference between real policies and Wikipedia’s fake, made up policies. When you request someone to unblock you and give out a good reason why you should be unblocked, certain users (I’m looking at you, Boing! said Zebedee) decline your request and tell you “Talk page access revoked, Feel free to request unblock on your original account (or via WP:UTRS) when you can stop behaving like a child.” I’m not behaving like a child, I'm behaving like an adult and JamesBWatson and Boing! Said Zebedee are just being nasty. I DECIDE WHO’S BEEN DOING VANDALISM AND STUFF LIKE THAT! NOT YOU BULLIES OF WIKIPEDIA USERS! Look, all you Wikipedia users, You can bully and boss other Wikipedia users around but THIS Wikipedia user is finished with all your lies, your bossing me around, your blocking me and your bullying. I HATE WIKIPEDIA, IT’S LYING POLICIES AND IT’S ALL IT’S NASTY USERS! I’M THROUGH WITH YOU ALL, YOU BASTARDS!

GOODBYE!"

Well Done, Homer Simpson of Springfield. I couldn't have put it better myself.

As for you, C.Fred, how dare you accuse my mate, 2A00:23C5:3F82:2000:6C52:4D4F:21E1:1F82 of doing a "personal attack" against another editor in his edit summary. He didn't do a "personal attack" against anyone, he only called the other editor a twat. Twat is just a word. Like fuck, which is also just a word. The sooner you (and all the other wikipedians for that matter) realise that, the better. Further, if he says Kate Robbins was born in Bradford in West Yorkshire, then she fucking was. You all should have been more accepting of our edits on certain pages (mainly the edits on the birthplaces) but you weren’t. It doesn't matter if they're from a "reliable source" or not because those edits are true.

My mates and I have had it with this fucking Wikipedia website.

Goodbye, you fucking stiffs.

Signed,

Shane from Sheffield