User talk:217.71.190.230

July 2022
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Women in the Indian Armed Forces, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 04:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rayna Kasabova. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The lead sentence already indicates that the first woman in the world who participated in a military flight & it is disruptive to remove her previous occupation. Peaceray (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Amazons, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray (talk) 04:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Hua Mulan. Peaceray (talk) 04:55, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rayna Kasabova. ''Stop trying to rewrite history to erase women's professions, especially when you are merely restating what is already stated elsewhere in the article, but overwriting other information relevant to the subject. Feel different? As WP:BRD suggests, discuss first at the talk page.'' Peaceray (talk) 14:17, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Women in the Indian Armed Forces. Peaceray (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Women in the Indian Armed Forces. Peaceray (talk) 04:17, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Women in combat. "fired guns" is simply redundant & superfluous as noted in the previous revert. Peaceray (talk) 04:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dames of Malta. ''I reverted your misrepresentation. According to the Sovereign Military Order of Malta article, females & males are distinctly "Dames" & "Knights", respectively. Stop trying to misrepresent history.'' Peaceray (talk) 19:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Please consider creating articles for Women in Red rather than chronocentrist negationism
I have seen some edits from several IP addresses, including this one, that attempt to suppress aspects of women's history. While I believe that these edits are an attempt at historical revisionism, I think that they are actually a chronocentrist approach that is historical negationism. Please consider that this is actually a form of antifeminism because it denies those actual conditions that women had to overcome.

If you truly want to advance how women are covered in Wikipedia, I strongly encourage you to explore WikiProject Women in Red, which seeks to create, translate, and improve biographies of notable women. Any effort towards this would be far more productive than any attempts to negate women's history. Peaceray (talk) 05:11, 31 July 2022 (UTC)


 * @Peaceray Unfortunately, the User is continuing with this behaviour, and deleted large blocks of text from the article of Brita Hagberg as well as other similar articles, describing the obstacles these women overcame and why they are relevant for articles on Wikipedia. Perhaps a block or some other sort of action is necessary.--Aciram (talk) 11:09, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DMacks (talk) 04:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DMacks (talk) 17:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of female American Civil War soldiers, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''No selective omission please. The fact is that the women had to fight as men & disguised as men to participate in the war. Do not deny women their history, even if men of the day denied women their capabilities. '' Peaceray (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Elfriede Rinkel. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Quotes must be in their original wording as per MOS:PMC. Peaceray (talk) 05:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dames of Malta, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray (talk) 06:02, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Women in the Indian Armed Forces. Peaceray (talk) 06:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Women's boxing. Peaceray (talk) 06:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rayna Kasabova. Peaceray (talk) 06:08, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Wehrmachthelferin, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 06:10, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rayna Kasabova. You keep removing that Kasabova was a nurse, & making her into a fighter pilot without a citation. Peaceray (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Women's boxing. Peaceray (talk) 14:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Fighter pilot, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Brita Hagberg. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. See WP:PEACOCK. Peaceray (talk) 06:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Brita Hagberg, you may be blocked from editing. Peaceray (talk) 06:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Brita Hagberg. Peaceray (talk) 06:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Nakano Takeko. Peaceray (talk) 06:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Nakano Takeko. Peaceray (talk) 06:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nakano Takeko. Peaceray (talk) 06:19, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Women in piracy. Please see WP:VNT that explains in a nut graph Editors may not add content solely because they believe it is true, nor delete content they believe to be untrue, unless they have verified beforehand with a reliable source. Peaceray (talk) 06:26, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Marie-Louise Victoire Girardin. Peaceray (talk) 06:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Participation of women in the Olympics. Peaceray (talk) 06:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Fighter pilot. Peaceray (talk) 06:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fighter pilot. Peaceray (talk) 06:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rayna Kasabova. ''Disruptive editing & no citation indicating she was a fighter pilot. No selective omission please.'' Peaceray (talk) 06:37, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Dorothea Maria Lösch, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Peaceray (talk) 06:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Margareta Elisabeth Roos. Peaceray (talk) 07:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ged UK  08:39, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Mercadera. Peaceray (talk) 14:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Hangaku Gozen. Peaceray (talk) 14:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Joanna Żubr. Peaceray (talk) 14:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Women in post-classical warfare. You changed the meaning of sentence, removed a clause, & left no edit summary. Peaceray (talk) 14:14, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 20:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Dieu-le-Veut. Peaceray (talk) 04:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rayna Kasabova. ''Disruptive editing & no citation indicating she was a fighter pilot. No selective omission please. '' Peaceray (talk) 04:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jacquotte Delahaye. Peaceray (talk) 04:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Women in piracy. Peaceray (talk) 04:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Participation of women in the Olympics. Peaceray (talk) 04:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Eleonore Prochaska. Peaceray (talk) 04:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)