User talk:217.71.52.170

April 2023
I've undone your edit to Sodomy law. Your removal of reliably sourced content at the article, which was backed by a professional, international survey organized by the ILGA, for no other reason than the fact that you don't like it, is not a good enough reason to remove this content. If you think I made a mistake, feel free to start a discussion at the article Talk page, Talk:Sodomy law, about why you think the data table in the article should be removed. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 09:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm Sjö. I noticed that you recently removed content from Stevan Moljević without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sjö (talk) 07:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please stop. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism. Joy (talk) 09:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Greater Serbia. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)