User talk:217.96.205.18

The Mann-Whitney test fails in general as the test of medians.
Added an reference to the articles showing, why the MW(-W) U test fails as test of medians: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00031305.2017.1305291 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1536867X1201200202 http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~kbarbe/StatMet1.pdf

Actually, there are lot of places, where it is discussed. Tthose are rather forum discussions or citations from software manuals, so I put them here, rather than the references: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/136636/reporting-results-of-mann-whitney-u-test-means-vs-medians?rq=1 https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/333561/interpretation-of-a-mann-whitney-wilcoxon-test?rq=1 https://www.medcalc.org/manual/mannwhitney.php Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. http://homepages.vub.ac.be/~kbarbe/StatMet1.pdf https://documentation.sas.com/?docsetId=statug&docsetTarget=statug_npar1way_details19.htm&docsetVersion=14.3&locale=en https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/333561/interpretation-of-a-mann-whitney-wilcoxon-test?rq=1 https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/407304/is-my-interpretation-for-wilcoxon-signed-rank-test-correct/407313 https://www.reddit.com/r/statistics/comments/29f0y0/interpretation_of_wilcoxon_signedrank_test_results/