User talk:218.238.18.208

May 2022
Hello, I'm Ïvana. I noticed that you recently removed content from Feminism in South Korea without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ïvana (talk) 03:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * i apologize for removing the content without explaining the proper reason.
 * According to the announcement of the Korean Archery Association, Ansan's request for medal deprivation turned out to be false.
 * https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/005/0001462033?sid=104
 * Therefore, since the phrase I deleted is not true, I request a correction. 218.238.18.208 (talk) 03:55, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Megalia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ïvana (talk) 03:31, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Namuwiki, you may be blocked from editing. Ïvana (talk) 03:35, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * i apologize for removing the content without explaining the proper reason.
 * 'Many entries have also been criticized for lack of neutrality to minority groups or women and how they are often written in a misogynistic or homophobic manner.'
 * the sentence is
 * 'It also places no strict restrictions on contributions that contain inaccurate information or subjective views.' Since it is included in the sentence, so there is no reason to emphasize it separately.
 * It is judged to be a unnecessary description, so I request a correction. 218.238.18.208 (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Namuwiki. Ïvana (talk) 04:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * i apologize for removing the content without explaining the proper reason.
 * 'Many entries have also been criticized for lack of neutrality to minority groups or women and how they are often written in a misogynistic or homophobic manner.'
 * the sentence is
 * 'It also places no strict restrictions on contributions that contain inaccurate information or subjective views.' Since it is included in the sentence, so there is no reason to emphasize it separately.
 * It is judged to be a unnecessary description, so I request a correction. 218.238.18.208 (talk) 05:12, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page DC Inside has been reverted. Your edit here to DC Inside was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRnBzoktK-E&t=258s) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.