User talk:219.100.37.240

February 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)


 * And I didn't do anything for block evasion. I just tried to communicate but not familiar with Wikipedia. But, Muboshgu was "incredibly" emotional and aggressive. 219.100.37.240 (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What exactly is the issue that leads you to constantly delete my posts? If you truly value fairness and transparency, please refrain from doing so. 219.100.37.240 (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not familiar with Wikipedia, and I had trouble locating the discussion page, which led me to repeatedly respond to users (Muboshgu and MaterialsPsych ) personally. While this may not be a problem for someone like you who is familiar with Wikipedia, it can be challenging for a beginner like me. Your lack of consideration for this and your emotional approach to this issue is a problem.
 * You claim my text is 'incredibly biased', but I just wrote the facts. 'Amy Klobuchar's tenure as Hennepin County Attorney has been marred by controversial cases ... Despite her role as lead prosecutor, evidence suggests that Klobuchar failed to ensure fair trials ... From the questionable tactics employed by her office to secure a conviction, to the failure to consider the validity of evidence, Klobuchar's handling of Haynes' case raises serious concerns about her commitment to justice.' Where exactly in this is not factual and is biased? She has not even apologized to the victim. Your use of the term 'incredibly' itself shows that you are approaching this issue with a biased perspective and emotionally.
 * However, if this is the issue, I will revise it to a neutral expression.
 * In addition, I clearly wrote in the discussion that I include the reference in the second and the third edits after I learned how to include references. That's why I couldn't include citation in the first edit that "MaterialsPsych" wrote that I violated a copyright.
 * So, You all are willing to abandon, block, and silence users who are not familiar with editing Wikipedia, just because you are accustomed to it. You handle things dictatorially, based on your emotions and your biases.
 * Reflect on whether this aligns with the spirit of Wikipedia or if you, as the ones in power, have become no different from the monsters you criticize and despise. 219.100.37.240 (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 * In the above "a neutral expression" means "what you think" a neutral. 219.100.37.240 (talk) 04:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.