User talk:219.77.182.250

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Mason (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Roman Catholic churches in Hong Kong. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Please review ; none of which got anything to do with inclusion/exclusion under the China or country churches categories which you claimed (nor anything with your consequent allegation of geography warring). 219.77.182.250 (talk) 11:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:219.77.182.250. ''Stop making inappropriate edits to your talk page. You may only use to request an unblock.'' WizardGamer775 (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Should I call this miscarriage of justice? 219.77.182.250 (talk) 12:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Could you please take a look into Mason's allegations which is practically made-up? She reported something which had never happened. The edits were just about a sort key and interwiki hyperlinks; there's nothing about what she called geography warring. Thank you. 219.77.182.250 (talk) 11:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * While I appreciate you using my correct pronouns this time, you know very well that you've made a pattern of edits across that match HKGW. You've been invited to make an account repeatedly, which would make it easy to distinguish you from HKGW. Mason (talk) 23:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * This time? Repeatedly? This is only the second or maybe the third time if I remember correctly. Can you explain which edits match what you called HKGW? 219.77.182.250 (talk) 11:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I notice you as what you have  to RFPP. Please clarify and explain which and how my edits may be associated with HKGW, given that you made the same edit which you had reported. 219.77.182.250 (talk) 10:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please stop pinging me. Your editing pattern is across IPs that is obvious. Even this edit today has you editing from another IP ( 219.76.25.216 ) and pretending to be this one (219.77.182.250) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:219.77.182.250&diff=prev&oldid=1224275424. Mason (talk) 22:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not on static IP and I didn't even notice the IP address assigned to me has been changed. What had I pretended? Either your edit was correct and you misreported it, or that the edit was a wrong one which you reported correctly. 219.76.25.206 (talk) 11:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)


 * 219.77.182.250 (talk) 11:29, 25 April 2024 (UTC) Could you please let me know which of my edits appear to be like HKGW so that I may see how to avoid such misassociation? 219.77.182.250 (talk) 10:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Quarry Bay School
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quarry Bay School. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. WizardGamer775 (talk) 16:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Please really don't take it personal. It's all about targeted at Hong Kong school articles which the notability requirements are clearly fulfilled. Maybe it will help if the notability tests/surveys can be quickly and easily performed before the nominations. 219.77.182.250 (talk) 11:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Roman Catholic churches in Hong Kong
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 01:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * As explained above, what's reported was just a false claim. There has been nothing to do with the country category. 219.77.182.250 (talk) 12:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I've changed the block to anon-only, talk page access revoked, account creation allowed. This person seems to fit the WP:HKGW archetype in terms of repeating their point without engaging in dispute resolution, including their latest attempt to canvass me by a ping. If this were indeed the classic WP:HKGW they would also refuse to create an account, so I've changed the settings to mitigate collateral damage. Deryck C. 14:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

'''This is a shared IP and the restrictions only applies to users who do not log in. If you are affected, please log in or register an account.''' Deryck C. 14:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Oneworld
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Mason (talk) 14:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Oneworld
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Mason (talk) 13:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

New message from HouseBlaster
House Blaster  (talk · he/him) 15:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Oneworld
May I know why you my edits? 219.77.182.250 (talk) 10:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)


 * As I have stated already on your talk page, you did not explain your edits, and it was not immediately obvious what the benefits of your changes were.Mason (talk) 12:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)