User talk:220.225.126.138

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The you made to File:AP propagation membrane model view.jpg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Until It Sleeps   06:17, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

February 2009
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. - Fastily (talk) 07:05, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Bone decalcification has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  Anna Lincoln  08:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ban, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ban was changed by 220.225.126.138 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-01-27T15:38:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Protein. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JForget 03:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Electron transport chain has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. M aen K. A. Talk  08:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Symmetry in biology, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mokele (talk) 12:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Isaac Asimov, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 19:15, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Referred pain, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- West.andrew.g (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kane (wrestler), you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 12:07, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Hyundai Atos. Mato (talk) 12:14, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Nagbhid has been reverted. Your edit here to Nagbhid was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/groups/nagbhid/?ap=1) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brahmanandam with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wknight94 talk 19:05, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ben Wallace with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Metricopolus (talk) 12:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nasreddin with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fumitol &#124; talk &#124; cont 13:51, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Source
Please can you give a source for the 19 deaths caused by Cyclone Keila? Bruvtakesover (talk!) 05:40, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation


I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harvinder Singh. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's an example of how to add references: Chzz is 98 years old.&lt;ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. &lt;/ref>

He likes tea.&lt;ref> Smith, John. " Interview with Chzz", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 18:09, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted.; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

February 2012
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Slit lamp, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Beauty, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Frigotoni ... i'm here ;  11:59, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of Tamil Nadu, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  ϮheⱾtrike  Σagle  ™  15:42, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2012 Study of authors of health-related Wikipedia pages
Dear Authors at the IP address 220.225.126.138

My name is Nuša Farič and I am a Health Psychology MSc student at the University College London (UCL). I am currently running a quantitative study entitled Who edits health-related Wikipedia pages and Why? I am interested in the editorial experience of people who edit health-related Wikipedia pages. I am interested to learn more about the authors of health-related pages on Wikipedia and what motivations they have for doing so. I am currently contacting the authors of randomly selected articles and I noticed that someone at this address edited an article on Irritable Bowel Syndrome. I would like to ask you a few questions about you and your experience of editing the above mentioned article and or other health-related articles. If you would like more information about the project, please visit my user page (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Hydra_Rain) and if interested, please reply via my talk page or e-mail me on nusa.faric.11@ucl.ac.uk. Also, others interested in the study may contact me! If I do not hear back from you I will not contact this account again. Thank you very much in advance. Hydra Rain (talk) 16:54, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Raadhika Sarathkumar, because to me it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks, Your edit here to Raadhika Sarathkumar was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://kollywudz.blogspot.in/2012/03/tamil-actress-radhika-sarathkumar.html#axzz22enAzhq8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

December 2012
Hello, I'm Kashmiri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Red Fort because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  kashmiri 11:16, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pysanka. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Arctic  Kangaroo  16:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stevens–Johnson syndrome, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 04:09, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Josve05a. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sudhir Kumar Chaudhary, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! (t) Josve05a  (c)  15:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harvinder Singh concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harvinder Singh, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:23, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Harvinder Singh


Hello 220.225.126.138. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Harvinder Singh.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Methotrexate because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 06:47, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to Venkatachalapathi Samuldrala prayer controversy
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Super48paul (talk) 17:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm Philip Trueman. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Human leukocyte antigen because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Philip Trueman (talk) 10:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello, I'm Vin09. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Visakhapatnam because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Vin09 (talk) 11:12, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to ADAMTS13 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 07:41, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

3rr
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 15:19, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

November 2015
Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Isotopes of thorium— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallized C (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Crowe sign— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crowe sign with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Crowe sign with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Scr ★ pIron IV 13:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kathir, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Stylez995 (talk) 11:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:36, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Belwine. I noticed that in this edit to Fertility clinic, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Belwine (talk) 19:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Apiary—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. -- Asartea   Talk  &#124;  Contribs  10:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

August 2023
Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sumbha and Nisumbha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nobody ( talk ) 17:16, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello, I'm Codename Noreste. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Early modern Europe—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Codename Noreste 🤔  La Suma  07:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)