User talk:220.245.208.179

December 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 15:20, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Frankfurt School. ''There is absolutely no consensus to remove this material. Make your proposal on the talk page. ''  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 15:31, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * It was discussed on talk, actually, but editors want to shut down the truth of what's really being said with the section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.201.129.66 (talk) 09:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Frankfurt School; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:47, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:51, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 15:55, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

, please revoke TPA due to IP making a vulgar comment. --IanDBeacon (talk) 15:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
 * What vulgar comment? These seem like extreme lengths to silence me. --14.201.129.66 (talk) 09:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)