User talk:220.245.239.207

You reverted my edit because it wasn't constructive. Information doesn't inherently need to be constructive. Constructivism is a form of logical development in argumentation. Since I'm not making an argument and only informing there is no need for constructivism. If you want to argue for necessary information dissolution you can so contend.

April 2021
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Salvador Allende—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:48, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Augusto Pinochet. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Czello 16:36, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Salvador Allende. Larry Hockett (Talk) 05:47, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kinu t/c 05:21, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.