User talk:222.155.74.219

January 2024
Hello, I'm Gadfium. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Julie Anne Genter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.- gadfium 08:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello. What gives you the right to delete my comment with nothing more than personal and subjective reasoning? My statement is factual. The beauty of Wikipedia is the functionality of being able to edit as you see fit. If what I wrote was offensive or blatantly incorrect, delete away. In this instance it's nothing more than a power trip. 222.155.74.219 (talk) 08:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. gadfium 08:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Julie Anne Genter. ''The onus is on the editor who makes claims to support their claims, especially on biographies of living persons. Per policy Verifiability: "Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations."'' Wikipedialuva (talk) 08:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Why does this need referenced when the information I posted is 100% factual? 222.155.74.219 (talk) 08:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. gadfium 08:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)


 * See you in a week then, you absolute loser. 222.155.74.219 (talk) 08:41, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * tArRiNg bY aSsOcIaTiOn
 * Lol. Fxxxing loser. 222.155.74.219 (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC) TPA revoked due to abuse- you don't seem to understand our sourcing requirements, nor the biographies of living persons policy which require all substantive information about a living person to be sourced. In the case of alleged criminal activity, someone must be convicted of a crime to identify them as a criminal. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)