User talk:223.178.212.52

April 2024
Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Isha Malviya, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''In addition, this reference does not say she was the youngest. Please stop.'' CNMall41 (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * THIS is the reference you used to support her career starting at six. Please show me where in that reference it states such. I am glad you are providing sourcing, but twice now it has been misleading. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


 * (https://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/tv-news/bigg-boss-season-17-exclusive-isha-malviya-talks-about-being-the-youngest-contestant-the) Everything is there. You might want to read through the refs to clear your doubts because everything added here is not only the truth but also available on notable media portals. 223.178.212.52 (talk) 19:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That is NOT the reference you used to support the content. You are just changing things and throwing references anywhere. The references used to support your changes should be WP:INCITE. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have provided all sources for you to fact check. Tellychakkar was not added because for some reason WP finds it non-notable. Even though it is a major Indian Television portal. You can keep accusing if you want to. I added sources and even showed you refs for your fact checking. 223.178.212.52 (talk) 19:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That is not really how it works. If Wikipedia does not find the source reliable, then it cannot be used. YOU are required to provide proper sourcing for anything you want to add/change. Keep on if you will but understand you may be blocked from editing if you do. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)