User talk:223.230.33.158

December 2019
Hello, I'm Thegreatluigi. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Thegreatluigi (talk) 19:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sarileru Neekevvaru, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

No subjective declarations, please
Hi there, re: this and this, Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, and we use neutral language to describe our article subjects. Please don't add this sort of non-neutral hyperbolic language, like "blockbuster", "super hit", "failure", "flop", "disaser", "rotten", etc. to articles. And any attempt to summarise commercial or critical response should be attributed to a well-known source, and written neutrally of course. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)