User talk:223.233.55.181

October 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ammeter—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 08:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

That's ok. I wanted to refer to a picture of such an ammeter, and since I had one in my own blog I thought it ok to refer to it, but I was in doubt. I think that a constructive solution would be to have a picture of the two types of edgwise meters. I now have them both in a printed version of Wireless World from 1972. But I have struggled so much with the rights of pictures (ie. that was about embedded graphics, a scale of an old instrument, I finally made one without ambedded graphichs) that I gave that up before I even tried. But should I go on with adding those two pictures from that magazine? Or maybe even just make one myself, like I did for the https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ac_src_meters_with_meter-shunts_speaker_with_load-shunt_rev2.jpg graphics –Øyvind Teig (talk) 08:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)