User talk:23.112.15.65

October 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Insufflation (medicine), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:35, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did with this edit to User talk:23.112.15.65. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMinersClick Here To Talk To Me! 12:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)


 * . . . and then you send the actual attack down a memory holw so the orignal poster cannot see it? How is that supposed to help anything?  If it really is this bad I'm not going any further with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.112.15.65 (talk) 12:53, 18 October 2018‎
 * Disguised vandalism on drug topics is extremely common, and there is no easy way for a patroller to distinguish between vandalism and a legitimate addition without a citation. Reversals of these kinds are part of our editorial process, and do not require this level of reaction. Note that all edits are visible in page history and are easily accessible to experienced editors. If you need any assistance at all, just give me a shout. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * "Vandalism" is a really heavy charge to level at anyone and from what I see anecdotallty and commonly hear about from others would be contributors it also seems to be the default. Guilty until proven innocent is what that sounds like. Diguised vadalism is an epistemological question which is so through-the-looking-glass that I don't know where to start and shall not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.112.15.65 (talk) 13:11, 18 October 2018‎
 * No one has accused you of vandalism at this point in time. I was simply explaining that we have to patrol for vandalism by sorting through edits, and there are clearly good edits, clearly bad edits and borderline edits. Your edit was an example of a borderline edit, and for better or worse a user temporarily reversed it. You then got angry, and another editor removed your personal attack. Arguably this served to escalate things, but at the end of the day we're all just distrustful beings clicking buttons on a computer. How this goes from here is really up to you. If you'd like help with your edit, I'm very happy to help. TheDragonFire (talk) 13:19, 18 October 2018 (UTC)