User talk:23.144.192.211

January 2020
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to History of women in the United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 18:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pilgrim. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Redemption (theology)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Abu Bakr II—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Bakr II. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   User3749 (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Bakr II, you may be blocked from editing. User3749 (talk) 18:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in George Clymer, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HouseBlastertalk 15:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Trains2050 (talk) 15:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2022
Hello, I'm Dewritech. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Crime and Punishment have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.  Dewritech (talk)  18:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

November 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tacitus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:53, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tacitus, you may be blocked from editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 17:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 1920s in Western fashion have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: 1920s in Western fashion was changed by 23.144.192.211 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966264 on 2024-02-08T21:26:39+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1920s in Western fashion. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:27, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1920s in Western fashion, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)