User talk:23.241.75.149

August 2021
Hello, I'm CodeTalker. I noticed that you recently removed content from Judy Justice without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CodeTalker (talk) 21:08, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Judy Justice, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 21:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop removing information from Judy Justice without providing a source to substantiate your claims. The text you are removing includes citations to reliable sources that contradict your assertions. If you have another source that supports your claims, you must provide it. You cannot remove content supported by reliable sources based on nothing but your unsubstantiated assertions. CodeTalker (talk) 21:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

IP, you have reverted Code Talker yet again while still failing to provide a credible source as to your claim. I checked again and I have seen now a whole multitude of sources that say the opposite of what you are saying. Even Koondel himself remarked on it, as reported from the Hollywood Reporter here and pointed out here  and here. Can you provide a source as to the contrary please. You are now in violation of the 3 revert rule as well, IP, if you continue to revert without sources.JudgeJudyCourthouse25 (talk) 23:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)